In my previous post about HIV/AIDS prevention public service announcements, I noted that they are “as direct as they can be in a culture that still shows very little kissing in its movies and television programs.”
But India is not alone in letting “morality” issues affect its fight against HIV/AIDS. Just last year, Texas voted to adopt health textbooks that focus on abstinence and barely mention the role condoms can play in preventing sexually transmitted diseases.
The Texas Board of Education even considered one textbook that asserts that “respecting yourself and getting enough rest are two steps to preventing sexually transmitted diseases,” according to the San Antonio Express-News. As the second-largest buyer of textbooks, decisions made by the Texas Board have tremendous influence across the country.
While abstinence appears to be a good idea to conservative Americans, the reality is far from what they envision. An eight-year study released earlier this year by researchers from several universities, including Columbia, found that people who pledge to protect their virginity until marriage are almost as likely to contract sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) as kids who make no such pledge.
 |
|
click image for video interview
|
“The sad story is that kids who are trying to preserve their technical virginity are, in some cases, engaging in much riskier behavior,” such as oral and anal sex, said Peter S. Bearman, a professor at Columbia’s Institute for Social and Economic Research and Policy, and the lead author of the study told the Washington Post. “From a public health point of view, an abstinence movement that encourages no vaginal sex may inadvertently encourage other forms of alternative sex that are at higher risk of STDs.”
President George W. Bush pledged $15 billion over five years for AIDS treatment and prevention in countries where the disease is running rampant. But one of the conditions of the legislation requires that one-third of the prevention funding go to abstinence-only programs.
Government-funded domestic HIV prevention programs that encourage people to use condoms are required to point out condom-failure rates despite scientific studies that show that condoms are 90 percent effective for preventing the transmission of HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases like syphilis and gonorrhea.
American television commercials bombard viewers with images of women with ample bosoms and long legs to sell everything from beer to cars. But the mere mention of the role condoms can play in protecting against sexually transmitted diseases is considered by many people (including President Bush) to be a moral lapse.
Understandably, the far more traditional Indian culture is now struggling to adapt to the need to openly discuss sex education with its youth. In this video clip, Anand Grover, an attorney and project director for the Lawyers Collective HIV/AIDS Unit in Mumbai, India, talks about this hurdle.
The Collective’s attorneys represent indigent people in court to help win them access to medicines or to protect their jobs against discrimination. The Collective is also trying to influence Indian legislation to make access to health services a government obligation.